4 ms·

I don't think it's an unfair complaint. Developers interface with the language using compilers and IDEs, and until recently (with libclang getting more popular

I don't think it's an unfair complaint. Developers interface with the language using compilers and IDEs, and until recently (with libclang getting more popular) that interface has been terrible. In a lot of cases it's still terrible. It's a real inconvenience, and there's no benefit coming with the cost. > Boost is extremely high quality in terms of its documentation, algorithms, and readability of the code - which is its core purpose. I've used Boost for over a decade now, and IMO "extremely high quality" is a stretch. Some modules are better than others, but there's no getting around the fact that many of them are only necessary because the C++ standard library is so bad.

fermienrico 8y ago
I am having a hard time conciling compile times as a complaint. That is a compiler problem. Or an inevitable problem as the project grows. I don’t understand how that is a problem with Boost. Same thing with the IDE. If you add an external library such as Boost, it is natural that your intellisense or whatever IDE feature may get slower. Both of these are undisputably an issue with the environment as a whole. How on the earth is it a quality problem with Boost!? Please explain.
- a_t48 8y ago
  Not OP but - Boost is a large library that can be tricky to extract only the portions you want from, leading to instances where you compile a lot of unwanted code, leading to ballooning compile times in exchange for only a little bit of extra functionality that you want. In my experience boost typically ends up being all or nothing, and very hard to remove once integrated.
renox 8y ago
Has been terrible? IMHO (eclipse and clion user) for C++ big projects the IDE experience is terrible! Vim isn't better as you need to spend a lot of time configuring it plus ctags and multiple tabs doesn't work well together..

fermienrico 8y ago

I am having a hard time conciling compile times as a complaint. That is a compiler problem. Or an inevitable problem as the project grows. I don’t understand how that is a problem with Boost. Same thing with the IDE. If you add an external library such as Boost, it is natural that your intellisense or whatever IDE feature may get slower. Both of these are undisputably an issue with the environment as a whole. How on the earth is it a quality problem with Boost!? Please explain.

a_t48 8y ago
Not OP but - Boost is a large library that can be tricky to extract only the portions you want from, leading to instances where you compile a lot of unwanted code, leading to ballooning compile times in exchange for only a little bit of extra functionality that you want. In my experience boost typically ends up being all or nothing, and very hard to remove once integrated.

renox 8y ago

Has been terrible? IMHO (eclipse and clion user) for C++ big projects the IDE experience is terrible! Vim isn't better as you need to spend a lot of time configuring it plus ctags and multiple tabs doesn't work well together..