I wonder what you think about this paper? https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jcmm.12088 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jcmm.120

I wonder what you think about this paper? https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jcmm.12088 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jcmm.12088 'extensive evidence has been published clearly showing that the EMF exposure can act to produce excessive activity of the VGCCs in many cell types suggesting that these may be direct targets of EMF exposure.' > Radiation would need to be ionizing and intense or have enough of a heating effect to materially alter the structure of gated ion channels I don't understand this point — why is it necessary that radiation be ionizing to affect VGC ion channels in a transient fashion that could still lead to long-term biochemical changes?