Option A: we attempt to prove a negative ("Lyft was not hacked.") Option B: because of a lack of evidence, we can do nothing to determine whether or not that's

Option A: we attempt to prove a negative ("Lyft was not hacked.") Option B: because of a lack of evidence, we can do nothing to determine whether or not that's the case. edit: Option C: he's responding to alerts while driving and he's looking for any other explanation for being rear-ended