2 ms·
I use the containers add on, and it's pretty much the only real advantage FF has over chrome. Still need user switching although, because sometimes I want to s
by woolvalley 8y ago
I use the containers add on, and it's pretty much the only real advantage FF has over chrome.
Still need user switching although, because sometimes I want to separate multiple google/twitter/etc accounts for example and still want the automatic url-based container activation.
If brave implemented containers although, I would probably use it because chrome works better than FF.
- jeroenhd 8y agoIf you run Firefox with the -P command line argument, a profile selection screen comes up in which you can create multiple profiles. These are completely separated (down to the HSTS state!) "accounts". I don't know how MacOS works, but if you set your Firefox shortcut to firefox -P you can switch profiles by restarting Firefox. Granted, it's not as nice as Chrome, but it might still be of worth to you in some way.
- woolvalley 8y agoI know about the -P command, that is why I was referencing the -no-remote option ;) Firefox has multi-user, it's just janky. You have to double click on your special shortcut with the command line option, and if some other program tries to open a url with firefox as the default browser with the -no-remote / -P command, then it will just not work if you have all users open. While with chrome it's 2 clicks away and no edge cases making other apps opening urls not work.