4 ms·
That's somewhat fair, although the 1Password X page (which is what AgileBits calls their in-browser version) describes it as being comparable to the native vers
by mithr 8y ago
That's somewhat fair, although the 1Password X page (which is what AgileBits calls their in-browser version) describes it as being comparable to the native versions, which to me goes against OP's statement that
> full functionality can’t be dependent on an app which is only available on Mac OS and/or Windows.
The existence of 1Password X means that full functionality is not _dependent_ on a MacOS/Windows app. The argument that there should be a graphical (because there _is_ a multi-platform CLI), native app for Linux, which does not depend on any browser, is a perfectly valid one -- but it is also an argument that I don't believe they've made.
- jik 8y agoThere is substantial functionality which is only available in the native app, not in 1Password X, and therefore completely unavailable on Linux. If the 1Password X claims that its functionality is comparable to the native version, then it is lying.
- loeg 8y ago1Password X is definitely not comparable to the native versions, and the statement was "full functionality can’t be dependent on an app which is only available on Mac OS and/or Windows." > The argument that there should be a graphical (because there _is_ a multi-platform CLI), native app for Linux, which does not depend on any browser, is a perfectly valid one -- but it is also an argument that I don't believe they've made. I think they're making that argument.
- hnra 8y agoI have no experience with the mac app but 1Password X is certainly better than the native windows app.