5 ms·
It was interesting reading this person's viewpoints but I think they misunderstand the point of copyleft licenses. > They’re forcing a world view that everyth
by dmm 8y ago
It was interesting reading this person's viewpoints but I think they misunderstand the point of copyleft licenses.
> They’re forcing a world view that everything should be free and shared like some sort of make-believe Star Trek future where money doesn’t exist.
Is a world where you are allowed to repair and modify your own house or car a "make-believe Star Trek future"? Asking to have insight and control over the software which plays an increasingly important role in our lives is not a fantasy to be dismissed.
> Ultimately, in my philosophy, copyleft represents real open source, despite what the OSI says. Copyleft is a restriction.
A typo? A restriction for you the creator perhaps, but for your users it represents the freedom to use, modify, and redistribute the software they use.
- z0r 8y agoRather than copyleft being a Star Trek fantasy, one being restricted from modifying (fixing) software they use is the science fiction dystopia!
- pauldix 8y agoAh, good catch on the typo. I meant the opposite of that, but so many edits messed it up. I get the idea that copyleft gives people the freedom to see the code and modify, but the limitations it imposes for using that code in derivative works is what makes me think it's a utopian ideal.
- efaref 8y agoThe limitations it imposes are the price.
- cyphar 8y ago> I get the idea that copyleft gives people the freedom to see the code and modify, but the limitations it imposes for using that code in derivative works is what makes me think it's a utopian ideal. The problem is you can't get the benefits without the cost. And all of the derivative works problems are political -- the issue is that companies don't want to (or can't for various reasons) give you their changes. Personally I view this as antisocial and shortsighted behaviour (when a company fails, the work in their fork is lost). Though to be honest, most proprietary changes aren't very good. The GPL is just one more (political) hiccup that gives an incentive for companies to contribute upstream -- in addition to general out-of-tree problems.