> whatever vices MJ has are not any reason for the law to be involved first of all you are relativizing because you are not even sure. And then the law get's i

> whatever vices MJ has are not any reason for the law to be involved first of all you are relativizing because you are not even sure. And then the law get's involved in much more trivial issues like littering. That's oranges to apples, but the point is I guess that law exerts control not just to protect the active individual.