3 ms·
So during the rewrite, he had the providence of the go codebase to look back on, and the Python version still had as many bugs per lines? That sounds like an ar
by defertoreptar 8y ago
So during the rewrite, he had the providence of the go codebase to look back on, and the Python version still had as many bugs per lines? That sounds like an argument for go, if anything.
- danpalmer 8y agoThis is true, I don't know the specifics, but I would trust that my former colleague wouldn't make such a claim based on such incorrect data. My guess these bugs were "code" bugs rather than "product" bugs, if that distinction makes sense.