3 ms·
> the article implies this mixup would NEVER have happened if the user's [sic] had not requested their data be released per GPDR. OK, cool. So as long as I don
by Supernaut 8y ago
> the article implies this mixup would NEVER have happened if the user's [sic] had not requested their data be released per GPDR.
OK, cool. So as long as I don't assert my rights under data protection regulations, Amazon probably won't orchestrate a grotesque breach of my privacy?
- vonseel 8y agoIt's a mistake, man (or woman). Shit happens. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ We have to expect as users of cloud software there is a chance our data could be compromised by BUGS or human error. I think that should be a given in any scenario. There's a difference between releasing data to third parties (or internal employees having access) as a matter of standard practice, and an unexpected breach or error in process leading to accidental disclosure of personal data. As a reader, I am uninterested in articles about the latter. It's clickbait / doomsday journalism. The most interesting stories are those about grave errors in judgment/behavior and cases that indicate a company has routinely breached user trust. I do not agree that "employee mistakes" fall in that category.