3 ms·
You can recover from a punch. You cant undelete your data once it falls on wrong hands and gets used against you (eg debt/purchase history). As I said there ar
by wav-part 8y ago
You can recover from a punch. You cant undelete your data once it falls on wrong hands and gets used against you (eg debt/purchase history).
As I said there are already enough physical measures (defence, surveillance etc) that can ensure public safety. However If I were to compromise: We can have multiple judges. An order should be vouched by more than one judge. It would be even better if the user can whitelist/blacklist judges to submit. Less bureaucratic liability for the state if data gets leaked/misused.
- brongondwana 8y agoI'm not sure what's more unrealistic, that you can recover from a punch or that it's viable to have per-user judge blacklists... https://www.smh.com.au/national/teenager-daniel-christie-dies-from-king-hit-20140111-30ntp.html https://www.smh.com.au/national/teenager-daniel-christie-die... I guess it's the punch then.
- wav-part 8y agoOk how does having access to sucker puncher's phone help me here ? I will still die.
- brongondwana 8y agoI think we're talking past each other here. I was pointing out an example of how there's no absolute guarantees that another human being won't mess up your life, not that you need to look at punchers' phones.
- wav-part 8y agoThe problem: I am asked to give up privacy. What I am getting in return, I can get more cheapely. I can avoid sucker punchers. No need to give up privacy. I can avoid going outside a walled garden. No need to give up privacy. You seem to be saying that its fair trade. I disagree.