3 ms·
A lot of compression ends up being compress once, decompress one to a few times, so the faster end of the spectrum fits well. Additionally, compression has to f
by terrelln 8y ago
A lot of compression ends up being compress once, decompress one to a few times, so the faster end of the spectrum fits well. Additionally, compression has to fit into the existing system, and existing systems already have tight constraints, so it is an easier sell to say "hey, we can compress faster AND stronger" than what you have right now. For our larger services, we will tune the compression level more carefully, and end up at different places for different services, but still normally around the faster levels.
That said, we still see users of the stronger compression levels.
- JyrkiAlakuijala 8y agoYes, plenty of use cases -- that's what makes compression so interesting! In my back-of-the-envelope financial analysis, the highest economic impact is when I can reduce people's need to wait for data to arrive. There we often use relatively slow compression even when it is for one use only. Computers are quite a lot (~1000x) cheaper than people's time.