I don't understand this comment chain, replies, patterns of downvotes at all. Nothing, anywhere, indicates that Project Mu has anything to do with "other OSes"

I don't understand this comment chain, replies, patterns of downvotes at all. Nothing, anywhere, indicates that Project Mu has anything to do with "other OSes" on Surface devices. And the grandparent comment is a direct implication that Project Mu would/will be critical to Linux on Surface. This isn't to say that this is not neat, from what I've heard about TianoCore and the codebase, but linking this to Linux on Surface seems completely invented and just a weird comment given that it already works pretty well, minus missing drivers that will still be missing even with an OSS UEFI core.