46 ms·
Was the data supposed to be stored in the first place according to the privacy policy/user consent? If not, it'd mean that Amazon stored highly sensitive data (
by tgsovlerkhgsel 8y ago
Was the data supposed to be stored in the first place according to the privacy policy/user consent? If not, it'd mean that Amazon stored highly sensitive data (audio recordings from people's bedrooms) illegally and in breach of user's trust.
- closetohome 8y agoWas there something in the article to suggest that it wasn't collected and stored in accordance with policy?
- DaniloDias 8y agoif you enable Alexa to tune to your voice, it retains recordings. You can listen to the recordings in you Alexa mobile app- so it shouldn’t be that much of a surprise. It shouldn’t be a shocker if you understand ML and infer what “tuning to your voice” implies. Most people aren’t sophisticated enough to infer that, however. To me- this is a big demo of unexpected consequences of GDPR. Sounds like a great law, but forcing companies to share everything they know about you increases the risk that a nice package of everything is shared with the wrong party.