3 ms·
I'm with you. I was severely unimpressed - I can't say "go to sleep in a half hour," but must say "go to sleep in 30 minutes." If I accidentally say "go to bed"
by kissickas 8y ago
I'm with you. I was severely unimpressed - I can't say "go to sleep in a half hour," but must say "go to sleep in 30 minutes." If I accidentally say "go to bed" I've got to start up a whole new "Hey Google" cycle again.
At least I know it's not listening to me all the time.
- miles 8y ago> At least I know it's not listening to me all the time. Do you really though? Google admits its new smart speaker was eavesdropping on users https://money.cnn.com/2017/10/11/technology/google-home-mini-security-flaw/index.html https://money.cnn.com/2017/10/11/technology/google-home-mini... And while Google responded quickly: Google just permanently killed the feature that made some Home Minis eavesdrop https://www.the-ambient.com/news/google-home-mini-spy-problem-fix-124 https://www.the-ambient.com/news/google-home-mini-spy-proble... who is to say what the next update brings?
- Karunamon 8y agoLet's keep some perspective here. By "eavesdropping", you mean a small handful (~4000 devices) of first gen devices that were never sold to actual customers with defective touch sensors causing the recording to be activated. The software fix pushed out simply disables the "push-to-talk" feature entirely. Unless you think Google has some kind of motive to listen to completely randomly-triggered recording (and they don't; the data would be garbage from almost any standpoint I can imagine), your post is incredibly misleading at best and malicious fearmongering at worst.