5 ms·
If I'm not in control of what I think, then I am not in control of what I do... In which case, we're all just robots.
by rubicon33 8y ago
If I'm not in control of what I think, then I am not in control of what I do... In which case, we're all just robots.
- conception 8y agoYes. But complex and interesting ones.
- _Schizotypy 8y agoin a very simplistic view, yes we are
- harlanji 8y agoFree will in this interpretation is making binary choices to manifest thought forms or not, and consciousness would be having the machinery to interpret thought and exercise free will.
- donaldknuth123 8y agoNot sure I agree with this. I think most people imagine that they have a landscape of possible choices or thoughts in front of them and they have some agency to maneuver through that landscape and modern research and even simple meditation will reveal that this is simply an illusion. I don't really want to chime in on the nature of Consciousness though.
- harlanji 8y agoMy thought is that the binary “do not manifest” decision could request delivery of a new set of similar thought forms which could then be manifest. There could be several types of thought forms that let us have the illusion that we are willing in related thoughts. Like an old iPod, perhaps. Consciousness is the most fun topic to speculate about, says the Buddha!
- donaldknuth123 8y agoIndeed, that's certainly one way to interpret the lack of free will. You might be inclined to join the Compatibilist camp, which I find intellectually lacking but many people are more comfortable with than raw determinism. Whichever stance you take its virtually certain that Libertarian Free Will, the kind of free will 99% of people imagine when they think about the idea, does not exist. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/compatibilism/ https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/compatibilism/
- techbio 8y agoOr ants. Perhaps the human species is a big robot, made up of replaceable parts, individually blessed with belief in free will.