3 ms·

You are incorrectly stating the Fallacy of the False Appeal to Authority. Citing an expert in their area of expertise is not an argumentative fallacy. I have

by skh 8y ago

You are incorrectly stating the Fallacy of the False Appeal to Authority. Citing an expert in their area of expertise is not an argumentative fallacy. I have no views as such on the study in question. I just know that there is a study by an expert and there are bko’s objections to it. Which one is more believable? I think it is much more likely that you are wrong and he is right. I’m guessing you haven’t read the professor’s work. The academic work he published and not an article in a magazine. So you don’t know if your objections have been accounted for in his work. You won’t take an expert’s claims at face value and instead trust your judgments on an issue you have no expertise on? This reminds me of Asimov’s famous quote. https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/456687-there-is-a-cult-of-ignorance-in-the-united-states https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/456687-there-is-a-cult-of-i...

bko 8y ago
> You won’t take an expert’s claims at face value Again this is appeal to authority. I trust the numbers coming out of the Fed that tell me unemployment and working hours are down Now another expert tells me people are facing crazy hours and layoffs that. So I choose to believe the Fed.
- skh 8y ago
  You don’t understand what the fallacy of the false appeal to authority is. It’s interesting that you accuse me of “appeal to authority” and then right away cite an expert source. Do you not see the hypocrisy in this? The professor lists a series of things that cause workers stress. Layoffs being one of them. The claim is not that every source of stress is increasing but rather the aggregate level of stress is increasing. It’s clear from the focus of the statistics you cite that you are likely much more uninformed than the professor.
- skh 8y ago
  As I suspected your statititic for the average number of hours worked per year does not tell the whole story and is not pertinent to the discussion at hand. Front he OECD source you quoted: The data are intended for comparisons of trends over time; they are unsuitable for comparisons of the level of average annual hours of work for a given year, because of differences in their sources. Part-time workers are covered as well as full-time workers.

by skh 8y ago

bko 8y ago

> You won’t take an expert’s claims at face value Again this is appeal to authority. I trust the numbers coming out of the Fed that tell me unemployment and working hours are down Now another expert tells me people are facing crazy hours and layoffs that. So I choose to believe the Fed.

skh 8y ago
You don’t understand what the fallacy of the false appeal to authority is. It’s interesting that you accuse me of “appeal to authority” and then right away cite an expert source. Do you not see the hypocrisy in this? The professor lists a series of things that cause workers stress. Layoffs being one of them. The claim is not that every source of stress is increasing but rather the aggregate level of stress is increasing. It’s clear from the focus of the statistics you cite that you are likely much more uninformed than the professor.
skh 8y ago
As I suspected your statititic for the average number of hours worked per year does not tell the whole story and is not pertinent to the discussion at hand. Front he OECD source you quoted: The data are intended for comparisons of trends over time; they are unsuitable for comparisons of the level of average annual hours of work for a given year, because of differences in their sources. Part-time workers are covered as well as full-time workers.