3 ms·
I'm not an engineer, and the article doesn't state it, but there are probably benefits to the technology. For one thing I imagine the heat-content and thus ener
by bayesian_horse 8y ago
I'm not an engineer, and the article doesn't state it, but there are probably benefits to the technology. For one thing I imagine the heat-content and thus energy storage density must be rather high, while the storage material is probably quite cheap. Water would have (a lot) lesser density, and most electrical batteries are way more expensive.
Additionally the molten salt may be good at insulating itself or at least easy to insulate against heat losses cheaply.
And maybe it can be fueled by energy forms other than electricity.
- londons_explore 8y agoThe main paper behind this actually dismisses insulation losses as minimal at scale. It suggests burying the tanks, and using earth as insulation. In a different section, it suggests putting hot and cold stuff in the same tank, which sounds incompatible though...
- bayesian_horse 8y agoMaybe not both at the same time?