3 ms·

Citation needed.

• walterbell 8y ago
  The political environment and visibility around copyright issues has evolved, and there are other legal avenues that can be pursued by Disney. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16096448 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16096448 > Will Congress do the same thing again this year? To find out, we talked to groups on both sides of the nation's copyright debate—to digital rights advocates at the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Public Knowledge and to industry groups like the Motion Picture Association of America and the Recording Industry Association of America. To our surprise, there seemed to be universal agreement that another copyright extension was unlikely to be on the agenda this year. "We are not aware of any such efforts, and it's not something we are pursuing," an RIAA spokesman told us when we asked about legislation to retroactively extend copyright terms. "While copyright term has been a longstanding topic of conversation in policy circles, we are not aware of any legislative proposals to address the issue," the MPAA told us. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/01/well-probably-never-free-mickey-thats-beside-point https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/01/well-probably-never-fr... > we expect that Disney will try to use another body of law to suppress creativity and commerce involving Mickey Mouse, whether or not "Steamboat Willie" and "Plane Crazy" are in the public domain: trademark law. If you sell something Mickeyish—including its public domain cartoons—Disney might ask a court to stop you because people who buy the cartoons from you may think they're buying from Disney.
  • ryacko 8y ago
    Maybe Mickey is not popular anymore, and Disney is moving on to newer IPs.
• IMTDb 8y ago
  "walterbell, HackeNews - Dec 2018"