3 ms·
> If it's cosmetic, then I could see the argument. Then there's another problem: who defines what is considered "cosmetic"? Most insurance companies currently
by kupiakos 8y ago
> If it's cosmetic, then I could see the argument.
Then there's another problem: who defines what is considered "cosmetic"? Most insurance companies currently don't cover e.g. facial feminization surgeries for transgender women, even though they're considered medically necessary by WPATH, a document drafted largely by insurance companies [0].
[0]: https://www.wpath.org/media/cms/Documents/SOC%20v7/SOC%20V7_English.pdf https://www.wpath.org/media/cms/Documents/SOC%20v7/SOC%20V7_..., p. 58
- UnpossibleJim 8y agoI said I could see the argument, not necessarily agree with it. I mean, in this day and age insurance companies also consider a severe cleft palate a cosmetic surgery and not a necessity. I certainly would not leave it up to them. I think it should be left up to the consult doctor, to be honest. If you don't agree, consult another =/