3 ms·
For this reason, I'm beginning to think that we do in fact have "universal" healthcare in that anyone can turn up to the hospital and be treated despite their i
by jclay 8y ago
For this reason, I'm beginning to think that we do in fact have "universal" healthcare in that anyone can turn up to the hospital and be treated despite their income. For those who don't pay (or don't have insurance) the hospital spreads that cost out over their other patients and likely marks up the price to insure against non-payment. So we end up with an unregulated mess where any one hospital has to insure themselves (in the form of passing on costs) against the percentage of patients that will simply never pay.
Given that this is going on, why not just switch to a single payer system and spread this out over a much larger population rather than each hospital trying to insure against it?
- ceejayoz 8y agoWe have universal care for emergency treatment, and only to the point of stabilization, and in a manner that basically combines all the worst aspects of various systems. You can't get months worth of chemo or physical therapy or dermatological consults or whatnot at an ER.