4 ms·
She was convicted of defamation with actual malice. "Too trusting" doesn't even begin to describe the hoax she pulled off.
by blfr 8y ago
She was convicted of defamation with actual malice. "Too trusting" doesn't even begin to describe the hoax she pulled off.
- danso 8y agoYes, you can still be liable for defamation when printing a false story, e.g. reckless disregard/negligence of the facts. My comment was that Erderly's failure/transgression was not one of fabrication. Doesn't change the damage of her reporting though.