7 ms·

Airborne pollution and sugar are both orders of magnitude worse than vaping could ever be. The authorities certainly seem to pick and choose which battles they

Airborne pollution and sugar are both orders of magnitude worse than vaping could ever be. The authorities certainly seem to pick and choose which battles they fight.

lotsofpulp 8y ago
One is easy to pin on a small private company, the other would involve targeting other politicians, larger deep pocketed companies, and raising taxes.
- vkou 8y ago
  One is easy to pin on a particular category of non-essential products (The world won't stop if non-smokers don't pick up vaping), the other (air pollution) is a communal externality of nearly every single productive activity that our society engages in (Because those activities involve either electricity or transportation, or both.)
  - deleted 8y ago
    [deleted]
  - bicubic 8y ago
    Are you saying sugary foods and drinks are essential products?
    - blackstrips 8y ago
      While the excessive amount of sugar in some food and drinks is bad, at least they don’t give you withdrawal when you stop taking them.
sigi45 8y ago
'could ever be' on which measurement? I don't think that we as a socieity don't have enough energy or mindpower to think about airborn pollution, sugar, smoking and vaping. Independetly of the risk for the consumer, i'm quite happy that vaping is also banned indoors. Imagine strawberry everywhere brrr
neaden 8y ago
I disagree. In most of the US the air pollution is less likely to harm you than vaping would. Sugar is a different story but it's one where you can have a healthy relationship to it, whereas you can't with vaping.
- EpicEng 8y ago
  >. In most of the US the air pollution is less likely to harm you than vaping would We don't know what the affects of vaping are, so how can you say that?
  - neaden 8y ago
    We don't know the effects, but we can be pretty confident on the floor. Meaning we know the minimum amount of harm nicotine in vaping is definitely causing, but we aren't sure how much extra harm could be caused by the flavorings, the heating process, problems with safety and quality control with the vaping juice and other issues.
- com2kid 8y ago
  > I disagree. In most of the US the air pollution is less likely to harm you than vaping would. Area wise? Sure. In regards to population centers? Air pollution has a known, life long, negative impact. https://nypost.com/2015/05/26/new-yorks-pollution-and-poverty-are-killing-kids-iq-study/ https://nypost.com/2015/05/26/new-yorks-pollution-and-povert...
- emiliobumachar 8y ago
  "you can have a healthy relationship to it, whereas you can't with vaping." Could you elaborate? Why can't one have as healthy a relationship with vaping as with sugar? Are we talking about occasional moderate use, or is it something else?
  - blackstrips 8y ago
    Given that nicotine addiction is a thing, I don’t think “occasional moderate use” is possible.

Airborne pollution and sugar are both orders of magnitude worse than vaping could ever be. The authorities certainly seem to pick and choose which battles they fight.

lotsofpulp 8y ago

One is easy to pin on a small private company, the other would involve targeting other politicians, larger deep pocketed companies, and raising taxes.

vkou 8y ago
One is easy to pin on a particular category of non-essential products (The world won't stop if non-smokers don't pick up vaping), the other (air pollution) is a communal externality of nearly every single productive activity that our society engages in (Because those activities involve either electricity or transportation, or both.)
- deleted 8y ago
  [deleted]
- bicubic 8y ago
  Are you saying sugary foods and drinks are essential products?
  - blackstrips 8y ago
    While the excessive amount of sugar in some food and drinks is bad, at least they don’t give you withdrawal when you stop taking them.

sigi45 8y ago

'could ever be' on which measurement? I don't think that we as a socieity don't have enough energy or mindpower to think about airborn pollution, sugar, smoking and vaping. Independetly of the risk for the consumer, i'm quite happy that vaping is also banned indoors. Imagine strawberry everywhere brrr

neaden 8y ago

I disagree. In most of the US the air pollution is less likely to harm you than vaping would. Sugar is a different story but it's one where you can have a healthy relationship to it, whereas you can't with vaping.

EpicEng 8y ago
>. In most of the US the air pollution is less likely to harm you than vaping would We don't know what the affects of vaping are, so how can you say that?
- neaden 8y ago
  We don't know the effects, but we can be pretty confident on the floor. Meaning we know the minimum amount of harm nicotine in vaping is definitely causing, but we aren't sure how much extra harm could be caused by the flavorings, the heating process, problems with safety and quality control with the vaping juice and other issues.
com2kid 8y ago
> I disagree. In most of the US the air pollution is less likely to harm you than vaping would. Area wise? Sure. In regards to population centers? Air pollution has a known, life long, negative impact. https://nypost.com/2015/05/26/new-yorks-pollution-and-poverty-are-killing-kids-iq-study/ https://nypost.com/2015/05/26/new-yorks-pollution-and-povert...
emiliobumachar 8y ago
"you can have a healthy relationship to it, whereas you can't with vaping." Could you elaborate? Why can't one have as healthy a relationship with vaping as with sugar? Are we talking about occasional moderate use, or is it something else?
- blackstrips 8y ago
  Given that nicotine addiction is a thing, I don’t think “occasional moderate use” is possible.