3 ms·
Having a diverse set of DNS software is a great thing, I'm not sure why you think that's strange. Why have every single router vulnerable to the next BIND bug?
by petee 8y ago
Having a diverse set of DNS software is a great thing, I'm not sure why you think that's strange. Why have every single router vulnerable to the next BIND bug?
- Fnoord 8y agoBIND? Who still uses that? Its dnsmasq and unbound all over.
- LinuxBender 8y agoBind is still very heavily used. Dnsmasq is popular in many of the container deployment models. I love Unbound, and hope that it gains more popularity. ISC (Bind) refuses to implement the min-ttl feature of Unbound. Unbound has better query (request and response) logging than Bind.
- fanf2 8y agoBIND 9.14 will have min-cache-ttl and min-ncache-ttl options https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/issues/613 https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/issues/613
- LinuxBender 8y agoOh wow, I wonder who convinced them to consider it. Nice!
- walrus01 8y ago> Who still uses that? The top 100 largest ISPs in the world, as measured by CAIDA ASRANK.