2 ms·
He's free to do whatever. Governments shouldn't shell out money to give to him because his solution isn't one.
by noobermin 8y ago
He's free to do whatever. Governments shouldn't shell out money to give to him because his solution isn't one.
- beobab 8y agoWhy not? If he can convince a government panel that he can give them some value for their money, then it makes sense to "shell out money" (very persuasive language there - I approve) to him. It's not free money. He has to give some value back.