3 ms·

Google’s AMP seems to circumvent this: https://www.google.nl/amp/s/www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-elon-musk-tunnel-20181218-story.html%3foutputType=amp h

Google’s AMP seems to circumvent this: https://www.google.nl/amp/s/www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-elon-musk-tunnel-20181218-story.html%3foutputType=amp https://www.google.nl/amp/s/www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-m...

korijn 8y ago
So is Google AMP or LA Times then in non-compliance?
- cronix 8y ago
  LA Times didn't want to play the GDPR game so they blocked most of the EU, as is their prerogative. If Google circumvents that and provides access, that's on Google imo.
  - deleted 8y ago
    [deleted]
- rsynnott 8y ago
  As long as AMP is GDPR-compliant, neither have a problem. The issue is that LA Times doesn't want to deal with getting the appropriate consent for their tracker scripts.