I used to be a name-and-shame supporter in the past, but if you think deeply about it you might realise it's a bad move. Name-and-Shame systems usually relies

I used to be a name-and-shame supporter in the past, but if you think deeply about it you might realise it's a bad move. Name-and-Shame systems usually relies on unverified complains: One can "identify" the wrong individual or someone can make a fake complain - In both situations someone's reputation will be damaged, sometimes boyond repair. That's why police should take care of this. They are supposed to be unbiased, run propper investigation and do proper verification. The fact that they don't do that is a different problem. Before you argue something like "lets verify those complains", Let me put in a different way: If you keep playing the if-that-do-that game, at the end you are going to see that we have basically two options: Live in a system where lots of criminals goes to jail but more inocents gets falsely implicated, or one where we get less false-positives but we also miss some criminals. Modern society has chosen the second option for a reason.