4 ms·
Making a small area uninhabitable vs killing millions a year, i know where i take my chances. Chernobyl killed almost no one, fukushima killed almost no one. Mo
by ThomPete 8y ago
Making a small area uninhabitable vs killing millions a year, i know where i take my chances. Chernobyl killed almost no one, fukushima killed almost no one. Mother nature kill more people in a day than have died from all nuclear disasters together. You really have the proportions wrong in such a fundamental way, unfortunately supported by media, politicians and environmentalist.
- adetrest 8y agoChernobyl killed a lot of people. Even today, more people than ever get thyroid cancer and disorders thanks to Chernobyl. While very few people were killed by the explosion itself, millions were affected and died from the event's consequences.
- ThomPete 8y agoNo it didnt kill a lot and i would urge you to find that evidence. Furthermore the amount of people who died from chernobyl in all the time after is a fraction of the people who dies of natural phenomena from nature every year, add on top of that the other reasons people die and chernobyl is not even worth mentioning. Again you guys have your proportions completely wrong at a fundamental level.
- lowry 8y agoIIRC, the number of direct deaths was around 100, including a helicopter crew that crashed on site a few days later.
- jabl 8y agoThe consensus view as reported by WHO estimates around 4000 in total will eventually die due to Chernobyl. Not millions.