3 ms·
I don't know what the spec's solution for that would be, but what you've typed would not work. Specifically because when I say `this.#foo` it is not a property
by __ryan__ 8y ago
I don't know what the spec's solution for that would be, but what you've typed would not work. Specifically because when I say `this.#foo` it is not a property on the object named "#foo". It is just the syntax for looking up a private field referenced by the literal #foo.
- Klathmon 8y agoThe spec's solution is to not solve that problem ;) Dynamic property access isn't allowed for private fields, so it kind of side steps that whole issue.