2 ms·
I'm not sure if you think you're correcting me, but it sounds like you think you've got it all figured out. Java calls them "primitive types", btw.
by civility 8y ago
I'm not sure if you think you're correcting me, but it sounds like you think you've got it all figured out.
Java calls them "primitive types", btw.
- brudgers 8y agoI was clarifying the difference between "everything is an object" as technically true and "everything is an object" as a commitment to semantic consistency. Probably because I'm still figuring out these ideas.