4 ms·

Yup, and after that, he issued a complete mea culpa and made it a point to look at the actual data.

• leereeves 8y ago
  Yes, and he admitted to misleading with fake math: > But it’s not how it worked for those skeptical forecasts about Trump’s chance of becoming the Republican nominee. Despite the lack of a model, we put his chances in percentage terms on a number of occasions. So it would be more accurate to say that he was careful during the second half of the election, after making significant mistakes (both mathematical and ethical) during the first half.
  • VintageCool 8y ago
    By "first half" you mean before Iowa, and by "second half" you mean after Iowa.
    • deleted 8y ago
      [deleted]