6 ms·
> In this video, the Waymo isn't avoiding a crash so much as potentially causing a rear-ender: https://youtu.be/vJovT6nsxB0?t=14 https://youtu.be/vJovT6nsxB0?t=
by cjhopman 8y ago
> In this video, the Waymo isn't avoiding a crash so much as potentially causing a rear-ender: https://youtu.be/vJovT6nsxB0?t=14 https://youtu.be/vJovT6nsxB0?t=14
wtf. This is a shitty example. If you either (1) read the captions on the video or (2) watch their full video where they talk about this, you'd realize that the waymo car stopped because a car off-camera ran the red into the intersection and that braking actually was avoiding a crash (or rather, decreasing the severity of a crash).
https://youtu.be/spw176TZ7-8?t=41 https://youtu.be/spw176TZ7-8?t=41
- choppaface 8y agoI've watched this video several times. There is a red car clearly present in the intersection when the Waymo begins forward motion. That car partially occludes (and is a potential obstacle) for anything that's off to the left of the camera; it also is simply a dynamic obstacle in the intersection. The Waymo can certainly detect and predict if cross-traffic is going to roll through the intersection. But the Waymo started launching right when the light turned green... even though there's a car in the intersection at that time. I agree this is a bad example due to the camera angle, but there's enough evidence to show that the Waymo failed to correctly predict traffic here. And it executed a safety stop (which could have caused a rear-ender) as a result. Occluders are still really hard for SDCs. Humans can usually handle them well though. Handling occluders properly requires a very strong prediction system.