4 ms·
Another way of looking at this: I used to think if I learned how to write in Perl or PHP or Ruby, I was programmer. But it turned out that was like thinking t
by nickelcitymario 8y ago
Another way of looking at this:
I used to think if I learned how to write in Perl or PHP or Ruby, I was programmer.
But it turned out that was like thinking that now that I can write in English, I’m a writer.
Then I thought if I learned the right tools and frameworks, THAT made me a programmer.
But that was like learning how to use Google Docs and calling myself a writer.
It turns out that the only thing that makes me a programmer is what makes a writer a writer: the quality of our output.
And the only way to improve the quality of our output is to learn the concepts as best as possible, and produce a lot of work.
I suspect most writers don’t know how to use 90% of the features of their word processors. (Ex: GRRM still writes in a DOS app from the 80s.)
I also know a lot of programmers who have a long list of frameworks on their resumes, but I’d never make the mistake of ranking them as better programmers than the guys and gals who write exclusively in C (for example).
- scarface74 8y agoAs a former C programmer for a decade, I can tell you that I’ve delivered far more business value to a company by knowing higher level abstractions than I ever did as a C programmer and my salary has gone up with the increased contributions.