The article's aim is said to be to clarify the meaning of that, but it still seems confusing: if it's rather informal, perhaps it is worth linking the mentioned

The article's aim is said to be to clarify the meaning of that, but it still seems confusing: if it's rather informal, perhaps it is worth linking the mentioned examples that refer to this equivalence. Sounds like it makes sense in some context, but evidently it may be hard to make sense of it otherwise.