But not understanding something is not a valid argument against it. It says more about you than about the issue. It may seem like a trivial point to counter you

But not understanding something is not a valid argument against it. It says more about you than about the issue. It may seem like a trivial point to counter you on, but I do think this line of (non-) reasoning is overused or at best just very poorly worded, and should be confronted as such. There are reasons. For example, it would be desirable for Google to avoid being complicit in human rights violations.