Hey it's their label, not mine. I guess in that sense then yes, "good" it subject to opinion. But so is "innocent" and "guilty," which is why we have laws to d

Hey it's their label, not mine. I guess in that sense then yes, "good" it subject to opinion. But so is "innocent" and "guilty," which is why we have laws to define the two. Google realizes that "good" is subjective. That's why they have QA, privacy teams, security teams, ect. They rely on a consensus of these groups to define what "good" means to Google using a variety of perspectives. Choosing to ignore literally all of these mechanisms not only means that something isn't "good," but it's also a pretty clear indicator that the people behind it know it's actually bad.