I don’t find your other arguments particularly compelling, but this one is definitely wrong: > Third, it must be that she was not hired due to the pro-israel l

I don’t find your other arguments particularly compelling, but this one is definitely wrong: > Third, it must be that she was not hired due to the pro-israel loyalty language, and not for any other reason. She had already been hired, and worked for several years. The loyalty clause was then added, and she lost her job due to being unwilling to sign that clause. She has plenty of evidence that it was due to not signing (ie, her boss tried to get around her having to sign it, but was forced to conclude that it was unavoidable).