You are arguing that the model is wrong. Which is not impossible, and is a theory that the statistical evidence also supports. You gave as an example human si

You are arguing that the model is wrong. Which is not impossible, and is a theory that the statistical evidence also supports. You gave as an example human size. It could also be a non-linear interaction effect between genes. Kind of like how most waves follow the linear wave model, but there is a separate distribution of very rare non-linear waves called rogue waves. (Very rare as in one every several months at a given spot.) When you combine rogue waves and a heavy sea, you get waves with a size that should be seen only once every 10,000 years or so anywhere on Earth. So yes, we can come up with all sorts of possibilities. However when you combine statistical models with specific photographic evidence pointing towards fraud, the fraud theory is a lot more believable than it would otherwise be.