>if you can't tell how many calories are involved on each side of the equation, it's a meaningless measure. Incorrect. It's an imprecise measure. You said "Som

>if you can't tell how many calories are involved on each side of the equation, it's a meaningless measure. Incorrect. It's an imprecise measure. You said "Some studies show as much as a 20% difference in what was on the label and the actual caloric content". So then the labels are accurate within a 20% margin of error at worst. Sounds like a pedantic little nag but then again - "Star Spangled Blizzard - Mini" - 430 calories - 1 serving of broccoli (1/2 cup, cooked) - 25 calories A 50% margin of error would be fine given some of the choices out there. With that said, you usually don't pick between a dq blizzard or broccoli. More reasonable comparisons would be a blizzard vs water (0 cal) or broccoli vs french fries (regular size - 290 cal). In a nutshell: if a thermostat's off by up to 10 degrees it can still ballpark whether the temperature's livable. https://www.dairyqueen.com/us-en/Company/Nutrition/Treats/ https://www.dairyqueen.com/us-en/Company/Nutrition/Treats/ https://www.dairyqueen.com/us-en/Company/Nutrition/Treats/ https://www.dairyqueen.com/us-en/Company/Nutrition/Treats/ https://www.livestrong.com/article/402398-what-is-a-serving-size-of-broccoli/ https://www.livestrong.com/article/402398-what-is-a-serving-...