Does this control for benefit from social anxiety reduction? Or benefit from experiences which wouldn't have even begun to occur (due to social anxiety)? "The

Does this control for benefit from social anxiety reduction? Or benefit from experiences which wouldn't have even begun to occur (due to social anxiety)? "The only safe level of driving is 0" and yet its trivially clear that someone who chooses not to drive due to fear of the risks, may experience stress and other factors equal to or outweighing the risks that would result from driving. I'd guess a more accurate statement would be that there is no risk-free level of alcohol consumption. Because, ultimately, there isn't a safe level of being alive. When your metric of "safety" applies similarly to what makes life even worth living at all, and decries life "unsafe", it doesn't seem very useful.