3 ms·
So maybe we'll learn the lesson that shorelines aren't constant, and stop building right on the water? The ocean levels have been up and down hundreds or thousa
by cpr 8y ago
So maybe we'll learn the lesson that shorelines aren't constant, and stop building right on the water? The ocean levels have been up and down hundreds or thousands of feet in the past.
Or we won't learn, and the rise will be slow enough that no one's going to drown. (Other than very low-lying islands, which were precarious to begin with, and which don't usually house complex civilizations.)
- jhanschoo 8y ago> maybe we'll learn the lesson that shorelines aren't constant, and stop building right on the water? Coastal cities will never /not/ be a thing. The ocean and river mouths contain very many important resources for societies to ignore. --- > rise will be slow enough that no one's going to drown. It depends on the solution: the cheapest usually is to build seawalls, and this obviously puts the city at greater risk of flooding. --- The comment you're replying to states rising sea levels as an example. There are, of course, known consequences that you don't address. To name two, it is a very direct consequence that 1) the weather will get more violent, with the additional amount of energy it contains, leading to a more frequent occurrence of natural disasters. Next, a change in climate will cause a massive redistribution and likely destruction of land suitable for agriculture, as well as lower overall quality for agricultural land, thereby 2) threatening worldwide food security.