3 ms·

It was announced, not available.

• ada1981 8y ago
  Yeah I mean this feels like it amounted to some marketing and a viral sign up page. I have no reason to believe there was any tech built yet.
  • minimaxir 8y ago
    Even assuming that they moved-fast-and-broke-things on the legal side, the development lifecycle of something as important as replacing conventional banking takes months, if not more. Robinhood likely lost a good amount of development opportunity cost with the cancellation.
    • dvtrn 8y ago
      Even assuming that they moved-fast-and-broke-things on the legal side Doesn't moving fast and breaking things on-as you say-"the legal side" in essence mean breaking the law, or did you mean something else and I've misunderstood?
      • minimaxir 8y ago
        Legal as relating-to-the-law, not legal as against-the-law.
        • dvtrn 8y ago
          Right, that much I grok, but when you say "move fast and broke things", in the context of "relating-to-the-law" what are you hypothesizing was 'broke'? I think it's a matter of phrasing perhaps, that has me a bit confused of what your post is suggesting as a matter relating to the law.