4 ms·
It looks like the first bit might also imply that you can use LLVM as the basis for a JIT compiler without having to license your code as Apache 2.0 or include
by bunderbunder 8y ago
It looks like the first bit might also imply that you can use LLVM as the basis for a JIT compiler without having to license your code as Apache 2.0 or include the attribution notices.
Maybe?
- justincormack 8y agoNo, that would not be "as a result of compiling", but you can do that anyway (with attribution and patent though), as incorporating Apache code into other code is fine in general.
- jcranmer 8y agoIf your program is calling LLVM APIs directly, the exception wouldn't kick in. So any JIT project using LLVM would have to comply with Apache 2.0.
- int_19h 8y agoComplying with AL in that case would simply amount to LLVM itself still being under AL. The code that calls it wouldn't have to be.