This is interesting, but I get the feeling that the investigator decided that his hypothesis was true and then went searching for proof. This is a very dangero

This is interesting, but I get the feeling that the investigator decided that his hypothesis was true and then went searching for proof. This is a very dangerous approach, particularly when it comes to history--it's very easy to cherry pick your supporting documents, and it's even easier to interpret events in a way that supports your narrative if that's your goal. It's also important to remember that none of this research has been reviewed yet.