I don’t get what the change of tone is supposed to signify. Your comment hints at it revealing some greater truth, but without elaboration I guess I’m too ignor

I don’t get what the change of tone is supposed to signify. Your comment hints at it revealing some greater truth, but without elaboration I guess I’m too ignorant of the social dynamics at play here to get it. Your last paragraph seems self-contradictory, unless you possess some unique insights into Bryan’s supposed influence. I also think disparaging everyone disagreeing with you as “cool-aiders” is somewhat cheap, and orthographically ahistoric. But someone from confluence already replied in the comments here, so I guess the point is moot?