There is no coherent point being made in the article, which is instead filled with vacuous weasel words like "many on Twitter [called out Dorsey for being tone

There is no coherent point being made in the article, which is instead filled with vacuous weasel words like "many on Twitter [called out Dorsey for being tone deaf]". It's sad to see this popping up in the NY Times. You could take that as a hint to scrutinize every article on this page a little more: https://www.nytimes.com/by/mike-ives https://www.nytimes.com/by/mike-ives