> Also how is improving hispanic voter outreach remotely a matter of controversy? Well hispanics mostly vote for democrats, so by increasing hispanic turnout y

> Also how is improving hispanic voter outreach remotely a matter of controversy? Well hispanics mostly vote for democrats, so by increasing hispanic turnout you will get more democratic votes. If google cared about democracy, why not help everyone get out the vote? Why are they specifically hiring busses for hispanics in swing states unless they are trying to help the democrats? > The US has universal voting rights. Their job is to connect people with information. Yes, and im telling you they were not connecting all people, but focusing on connecting certain kinds of people to vote. > Complaining about it strikes of the Dotcom Freudian slips of bribery in complaining about him making music videoes with rappers Huh? > That is downright saintly compared to lobbying and media conglomerates giving blatant editorial pushes. So i don't get your arguemnt other than something about kim dotcom and rappers and because of that it's actually a good thing? How would you feel if facebook ran a campaign of "getting out the white vote" that paid millions of dollars in adds and hiring rentals and drivers to get out only white people to the polls? Or just replace white with democrat or republian. I don't see how anyone sees this as "saintly" rather than exactly what it is, a company in it's position of power trying to influence the results of an election. I have no idea how anyone but a radical capitalist sees that as a great service.