3 ms·
Going back to google makes sense as my intention is to read the news of the day, not cross reference. Stack behavior would drive me crazy here.
by grogenaut 8y ago
Going back to google makes sense as my intention is to read the news of the day, not cross reference. Stack behavior would drive me crazy here.
- tyingq 8y agoI suppose, but that sort of reinforces the real purpose of AMP. No publisher in their right mind would give up the top part of their page and enable left/right swipe to navigate to competitors, give up the back button control, etc. It's basically a protection racket. Pay up (in control terms), or get pushed down the search results page. Feels a lot like the old "digg bar" (https://moz.com/ugc/die-diggbar-die-die-should-you-kill-the-digg-bar-on-your-website https://moz.com/ugc/die-diggbar-die-die-should-you-kill-the-...)
- grogenaut 8y agoFor me though, they already have. I don't browse via their nav. I spearfish articles and I'm out. I find most news sites navigation and search garbage and have to resort to site: searches
- criddell 8y ago> No publisher in their right mind would give up the top part of their page and enable left/right swipe to navigate to competitors Publishers usually do not make good decisions. That behavior is for users and (IMHO) it's great.
- notahacker 8y agoThat behaviour is for Google, not for users.