If it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that people died because of this, and that execs knew the results and danger and ignored them, why shouldn't the s

If it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that people died because of this, and that execs knew the results and danger and ignored them, why shouldn't the state(s) charge them personally with murder /manslaughter ? In the end someone, a living, breathing human being, made the final decision to ju$t keep going. Let them explain it to the jury. Asbestos was found in powder and people died because of it (assuming both can be proven--a judge will have to convinced first and then it goes to trial.) Money is one part of the equation, you can be jailed for life for murder and asked to pay $15million for killing that person.