I think it’s a play on the word serverless and their argument that serverless is a lot less performant than “serverful” in the general use case. “Less is more”

I think it’s a play on the word serverless and their argument that serverless is a lot less performant than “serverful” in the general use case. “Less is more” ==> “serverless is more” ==> “But serverless is too much less performant” ==> “Too much ‘less’” ==> “Too less” ...or something like that? I wouldn’t worry about it. I’m a native English speaker and I also thought it was awkward, though I (think I) know what they were going for.