3 ms·
Yes, I agree, then it should fall on the CEO, who is responsible for signing off on all of this activity, like financials. You’re right that we don’t want the
by bluejekyll 8y ago
Yes, I agree, then it should fall on the CEO, who is responsible for signing off on all of this activity, like financials.
You’re right that we don’t want the guys in the trucks getting busted for fraud, but that shouldn’t mean that we allow the upper management to get off.
- int_19h 8y ago> You’re right that we don’t want the guys in the trucks getting busted for fraud If they knowingly participated in it, why not? In the military, where subordination is far stricter, there's still the concept of unlawful orders, and subordinates are expected to refuse to carry out such orders - and if they do not, they can be held accountable for that.
- anticensor 8y agoSome militaries explicitly lack the concept of unlawful orders and surprise surprise - they are the least successful ones. Same thing also applies to businesses. If you do not have a complaint procedure, you acknowledge you are incompetent.